Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nicole Gadient vs Meta Marenk Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gadient vs Marenk analysis and find out who is favored!
Nicole Gadient vs Meta Marenk Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gadient 1 - 0 Marenk
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gadient has won 44.07% of points on their second serve, while Marenk has won 40.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gadient, in recent form, has won 58.62% of their opponent's second serve points, while Marenk has won 51.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.59% and 33.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gadient has saved 44.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marenk has saved 35.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gadient has won 47.73% of matches played (W/L 21/ 23), with Marenk winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gadient has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 53/ 66), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 63/ 92). Marenk has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 30% (W/L 10/ 23), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Gadient has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 20/ 16), where as Marenk has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 14.29% of matches (W/L 1/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gadient winning 1 times and Marenk being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gadient winning 2 and Marenk winning 1. The last match between Gadient and Marenk was at the W15 Kranjska Gora, 12-06-2023, Q1 round, Clay with Nicole Gadient getting the victory 3-6 6-4 10-6.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gadient and Marenk have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gadient winning 1 times and Marenk 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gadient winning 0, and Marenk 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gadient has played against opponents with an average rank of 80.91 while Marenk has played against players with an average rank of 201.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gadient has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marenk has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gadient has converted 49.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marenk has converted 34.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
42% (133-181)
Career Total W/L
28% (11-28)
50% (7-7)
YTD W/L
10% (1-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nicole Gadient vs Meta Marenk For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gadient VS Marenk
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Nicole Gadient | Meta Marenk |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 10-6 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nicole Gadient | Meta Marenk |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (7/7) | 10% (1/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (16/14) | 14% (3/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (133/132) | 31% (55/124) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 14% (1/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 4 | 3 |
| DFs per game | 0.06 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 8 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 102.57 | 201.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 77% (391/509) | 66% (152/229) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (213/391) | 39% (59/152) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (52/118) | 40% (31/77) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (30/61) | 35% (9/26) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (222/500) | 38% (95/247) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (7/7) | 14% (1/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (7/14) | 10% (1/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (9/0) |
Nicole Gadient Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Aino Alkio
Player
Nicole Gadient
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
59 of
79)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
0
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-3 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nicole Gadient
Player
Francesca Dell'Edera
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
89%
(
49 of
55)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eleejah Inisan
Player
Nicole Gadient
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
84%
(
37 of
44)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicole Gadient
Player
Adela Polakovicova
94%
(
58 of
62)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nicole Gadient
Player
Korina Roso
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve %
80%
(
47 of
59)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Nicole Gadient
87%
(
41 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Meta Marenk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Chiara Girelli
Player
Meta Marenk
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rinon Okuwaki
Player
Meta Marenk
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
80%
(
40 of
50)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
12 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Manca Pislak
Player
Meta Marenk
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
68%
(
26 of
38)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
12 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Meta Marenk
Player
Nikola Koprivova
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Deborah Chiesa
Player
Meta Marenk
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 5-7 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Gadient Vs Marenk Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gadient are available here and Marenk photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
